🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

Based on recent research, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making average wages must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what average American pays. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of federal military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation is that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.